Concerns Raised Over AI-Generated Video Impersonating Vice President Kamala Harris

A video featuring an AI-generated voice impersonating Vice President Kamala Harris has sparked concerns about the potential for AI to mislead the public as the US presidential election approaches. The video gained attention after tech billionaire Elon Musk shared it on his social media platform X, without explicitly stating that it was originally intended as a parody. Musk later clarified that the video was intended as satire, but the initial lack of clarification raised questions about the power of AI to manipulate information.

The video, which mimics a real campaign ad released by Harris, replaces her voiceover with an AI-generated voice that convincingly impersonates her. The AI voice claims that Harris is a “diversity hire” and questions her ability to run the country. While the video includes authentic past clips of Harris, it retains the “Harris for President” branding.

The widespread sharing of this video highlights the increasing accessibility of high-quality AI tools and the lack of federal regulations governing their use. As a result, the responsibility for regulating AI in politics largely falls on individual states and social media platforms. The video also raises questions about how to handle content that blurs the lines between appropriate use of AI and satire.

The original creator of the video, a YouTuber known as Mr Reagan, clearly labeled it as a parody from the beginning. However, Musk’s initial post on X, which reached a wide audience of 130 million views, did not include a clear indication that it was a joke. Some users suggested labeling the post as manipulated, but no such label was added.

Experts who specialize in AI-generated media confirmed that the video’s audio was largely generated using AI technology. They emphasized the power of generative AI and deepfakes, noting that the AI-generated voice in the video adds to its impact. They called on AI companies to take greater responsibility in ensuring their tools are not used to harm individuals or democracy.

Opinions differ on the potential impact of the video. While some believe that most people would recognize it as a parody, others argue that it could deceive many viewers due to its alignment with preexisting themes surrounding Harris. The quality of the video, although not perfect, is deemed sufficient to convince a significant portion of the audience.

Share this post

Let's Create free account on audie. No credit card required, give Author’s Voice a try!

Resend Verification Email

Enter your email to receive the verification code

[uv_resend_verification_form]